PHP is a contemporary framework for software development, offering significantly more freedom in terms of a structured coding pattern and the ability for our supplied programmes to perform better. When there is a security violation, the security component is quick to respond in both CodeIgniter and Laravel. The syntax dictionaries in Laravel are beautiful and expressive. The following are the variations between CodeIgniter and Laravel:
Key differences between Laravel and CodeIgniter
support for PHP 7
PHP 7, a server-side programming language, contains a variety of unique features and improvements. With the help of the new features, programmers may improve web application performance while using less memory. PHP 7 is supported by Laravel and CodeIgniter. However, some programmers have emphasised the challenges they ran across when developing and testing CodeIgniter applications on PHP 7.
Most developers break up huge, complex web apps into a number of tiny modules to simplify and speed up the development process. Modularity was a design principle behind Laravel. Developers can divide a project into digestible parts using a bundle. The modules can be used by users again for different projects. However, CodeIgniter’s design does not take modularity specialisations into account. CodeIgniter programmers must additionally utilise Modular Extension to create and manage modules.
assistance with databases
Both PHP frameworks support a wide range of databases, including MySQL, PostgreSQL, Microsoft Bi, and MongoDB. In contrast, CodeIgniter, which competes with Laravel, also provides support for a variety of databases, including Oracle, Microsoft SQL Server, IBM DB2, orientdb, and JDBC compatible. As a result, CodeIgniter supports more databases than Laravel.
Development of database schemes
Despite highlighting several popular databases, CodeIgniter does not provide any particular features to make database schema change obvious. Although developers may modify and share the application’s database schema more easily with Laravel’s emphasis on DB-agnostic migrations without having to rewrite extensive code, this is not the only advantage of this strategy. The developer can easily create the database schema for the application by combining the schema builder offered by custom Laravel website development with the database agnostic migration.
a fluid ORM
Laravel allows developers the freedom to use Graceful ORM, in contrast to CodeIgniter. They can practise utilising the object-relational mapper (ORM) framework to collaborate more effectively with a range of databases by creating Active Record. Fluent ORM allows users to interact directly with databases since each database table is modelled in depth. The model can be used to perform even regular tasks like creating new entries and running database queries.
Integrated Template Engine
Similar to Blade, Laravel provides a simple but effective template engine. Using the Blade template engine, PHP programmers may enhance and manage views to effectively represent the online application. But CodeIgniter doesn’t appear to have a built-in template engine. The framework must be used in conjunction with strong template engines like Smarty by the developers to finish common chores and enhance the functionality of the website.
Development of REST API
Developers may quickly and simply design a variety of REST APIs with the help of Laravel’s RESTful Controllers. They only need to set the restful property in the RESTful Controller to true in order to establish distinctive REST APIs without writing additional code. CodeIgniter does not, however, provide any special features to facilitate the development of REST APIs. Users that use CodeIgniter to build web applications must write extra code to create bespoke REST APIs.
The routing settings in both PHP frameworks are equal in terms of functionality. But because to Laravel’s features, developers can route requests in a straightforward but efficient way. Programmers can use Laravel’s routing functionality to define the bulk of routes for a website in a single file. Additionally, every basic Laravel route only accepts a single URI and closure. Users can still register a route that can react to multiple HTTP verbs simultaneously.
They are both open-source PHP frameworks. Each framework also has a vibrant community supporting it. Even said, a lot of web developers assert that the Laravel community is far more vibrant than the one for CodeIgniter. Developers generally find it simpler to obtain online help and rapid fixes while building web projects with Laravel integration.
Developers must still contrast the features of Laravel vs CodeIgniter depending on the unique requirements of each project in order to choose the best PHP framework.